Saturday, July 5, 2008

Hasslington V.P. Endorsement: Senator Obama Should Select Senator Biden To Be His Running Mate; Also, Have A Happy (Belated) Birthday, U.S.A.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, U.S.A.

First of all, I'd like to wish my home country, the United States of America--which turned 232 years old yesterday, July 4--a very happy birthday. Mrs. Hasslington and I celebrated the day by lounging on the shores of historic White Bear Lake (written about by, amongst many others, Mark Twain), which is located several miles northeast of Saint Paul, Minnesota. She snapped a few pictures of her first ever Independence Day fireworks display (which took place over the lake), which was odd as it is representative of the U.S. getting pummeled by her country's military forces, but that was quite some time ago, so.... Prior to that, we embodied the July 4th stereotype of "Americans Gorging" by eating way too much grilled food (salmon this year, not steak or chicken). Well, okay, I ate too much food; she did not. (I suppose I could claim that I was using the "royal we" just there, though that would be an admittedly weak excuse for having been overzealously inclusive....)

REGARDING SENATOR OBAMA'S RUNNING MATE CHOICES: I'M SIDIN' WITH BIDEN

I maintain that New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson would make a wonderful Secretary of State, should Senator Obama be elected president. (His resume' has Secretary of State written all over it.) I endorse him for that position. I also maintain that U.S. Senator Joe Biden (of Delaware) would be a tremendously strong running mate, so much so that I endorse him for the position. I've written about his (and other people's) qualifications for the job several times in the past few months, so I'll keep my re-hashing of those qualifications to a minimum here. (Yeah, right....)

Let it suffice to say that Senator Biden is a foreign policy expert (he has been a long-standing member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which he presently chairs) who understands the complexities involved in international relations; Senator Obama is understandably weak on foreign relations experience (though his international world view, partly due to his background, is strong--he understands the role the U.S. must play in a rapidly changing world very well indeed), so selecting Biden would help him insofar as that's concerned. Senator Biden is also superb in debate scenarios--he's a happy attack dog who manages to use "big words" on a frequent basis, while simultaneously appealing to blue collar voters with his tenacity and consistency at the podium. Mixed with some truly amusing "quips," he's a master of debate craft whose only stumbling point is that his conviction can slide into a sort of ueber-intensity that resembles anger from time to time (it's not anger, but it can be confused with it at times).

Senator Biden has oodles of Washington experience, which could be leveraged to allow Senator Obama to carry on with his personal "outsider" message (it's the ultimate "balanced" ticket, in that sense). He is in his mid-sixties (which offsets Senator Obama's relative youth); he's a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee (which would help in arguing against the sort of legal shenanigans perpetuated by the Bush Administration); he's Catholic (Senator Obama lost the Catholic primary vote rather heavily to Senator Clinton in several key "swing states," so Senator Biden could help win a certain percentage of them over to an Obama-led ticket); he is one of the main authors of the "Violence Against Women Act" (which stiffened penalties against individuals who commit violent crimes against women--that might help win back some of Senator Clinton's more fervent supporters); and, simply put, he looks the part of a "Founding Father" (his face seems as though it should be on a dollar bill). He also understands how presidents become successful and maintain success (he's served in the national legislature during the tenures of seven presidents), and he therefore knows what to do in order to avoid being unsuccessful, so he could guide a potential President Obama through some of the minutae of the job, handling some of it on his own so that a President Obama could focus on the "big picture" issues.

It's said that Senator Biden's mouth has a tendency to go on and on...and on some more. That's sometimes true, but if he can be a bit on the "windbag" side of things from time to time, it's nonetheless the case that the things he carries on talking about--Bush Administration failures, both at home and abroad; a more proper use of our soft and hard power insofar as foreign policy leverage is concerned; balancing out the various sources of energy we use so that the U.S. can wiggle out of the grip of foreign oil conglomerates; how to "right" the economic ship through the combination of a more balanced foreign policy and more sustainable overall domestic policy--are by-and-large the types of things that most concern Americans right now.

Joe Biden could very easily transition from Vice President to President if something tragic were to occur, which is important given the fact that the first consideration for anyone picking a running mate ought to be whether that person can almost seamlessly transition to the top slot if need be. At the risk of this defense of Senator Biden sounding like a testimonial to him, I assert that he is whip-smart, experienced at the national and international levels, compelling to various types of voters, and prepared for the role of either Vice President or President "from day one," as the saying goes.

There are a lot of potentially strong running mates for Senator Obama, but Senator Joe Biden is the strongest of the bunch. Later this summer, Senator Obama ought to select him for the role. That would make for a very strong, very balanced ticket indeed.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Your comments are spot on, Hasslington. Joe Biden would be a great choice for Veep with Bill Richardson as Secretary of State in my humble opinion.

Caroline Kennedy has been discreetly doing the rounds on Capitol Hill and will make recommendations to Senator Obama in due course... I would be delighted to see Joe Biden as Obama's running mate....

A belated Happy Fourth to you and yours, and enjoy the rest of your summer.

Anonymous said...

I think many of the VP names that have been floated will be eliminated after vetting. Biden is one of a small group who passes the two big tests:
Could they be president in an emergency?
Will they do no harm during the election?

Obama has said he would also like his VP to be essentially a consiglieri. Biden seems well-suited to that gig too.

Brian Schweitzer and Kathleen Sebelius also strike me as good picks but Biden's foreign policy experience may win out (unless Obama prefers him for Secretary of State). Besides which, Schweitzer can still govern Montana for another four years and Sebelius is a great candidate for Brownback's Senate seat in two years. Biden VP, Richardson State seems very solid.

Anonymous said...

"Brian Schweitzer and Kathleen Sebelius also strike me as good picks but Biden's foreign policy experience may win out (unless Obama prefers him for Secretary of State). Besides which, Schweitzer can still govern Montana for another four years and Sebelius is a great candidate for Brownback's Senate seat in two years. Biden VP, Richardson State seems very solid."---different anonymous


Your comments are appreciated. Barack cannot put a woman on the ticket UNLESS it's Hillary Clinton. To do otherwise would be a huge insult to the Clintons and would just open re-open old wounds and probably split the Democrats right down the middle .

I still say Barack should pick Joe Biden to serve, I really can't think of anyone better for the role....

Anonymous said...

"Barack cannot put a woman on the ticket UNLESS it's Hillary Clinton. To do otherwise would be a huge insult to the Clintons and would just open re-open old wounds and probably split the Democrats right down the middle..."

That's probably right, even though the Clinton logic doesn't hold up under scrutiny. It amounts to saying Obama should pick the most qualified person for VP, but if he favors a woman who's not Hillary, that person should be disqualified because of her gender. It'd actually be saddling Sebelius with more sexism than Hillary herself faced. That said, the fact that it's illogical, doesn't mean it's not realistic and the Obama campaign seems to operate with realism in mind. Fair or not, you're probably right that it might open old wounds.

And this reveals one more strategic reason to pick Biden. I assume, given the Clinton's dogged refusal to surrender, that Hillary running for president again at some point is on their minds. Many cynics (which include her supporters) guess it's the main motivator for her stumping for Obama this time. Biden, at 65, would be 73 in 8 years. That's a bit old to run for president. McCain at 72 would have lost this time to Obama. Hillary, at Reagan's election age of 68-69, could more realistically run. So elevating Biden's prominence with the VP position is less of a threat to Hillary's long-term 2016 ambitions (and those cheering her on). It's easier for Hillary to campaign sincerely for Obama, and for her supporters to reconcile supporting Obama with their desire that Hillary be president one day. I don't personally care about HIllary (or any politician's) career but the more enthusiastic she and her supporters are the better. Not that I think the Obama campaign will categorically rule out anyone younger who, as incumbent VP, would threaten Hillary's 2016 ambitions but if a good choice also doesn't antagonize the Clintons, it probably makes the choice even more appealing.

Hasslington said...

"Anonymous" and "Different Anonymous" (I like that latter name),

I agree entirely regarding the gender issue as it applies to Senator Obama's running mate choices.... It's unfair, but choosing Governor Sebelius to be his running mate would most likely look like a "too obvious" attempt to win the support of Senator Clinton's most committed supporters without putting Senator Clinton on the ticket. So Senator Obama is likely to obviate that potential sticking point by picking a man. (Again, it's not particularly fair, but there you have it.)

Senator Biden does indeed pass all the meaningful "scrutiny tests," whereas others are likely to pass a few but fail one or two--again, fairly or unfairly.

He has always struck me as a very smart guy who can speak simultaneously to both the more "erudite" set (so to speak) and the more "pedestrian" set (again, so to speak); to be able to do that without much shifting of gears is really quite a useful and remarkable political talent. He's also experienced, and all of the other (rather endless) stuff I went on and on about.

He's not only the "safe" choice this time around, but also the right one because he's the all-around strongest of the available options. Others are also strong (Nunn, Bayh, Sebelius, Webb, Warner, Clinton, Richardson, Clark, Kaine, Napolitano, even Gore, and the list goes on), but they're not as well-rounded for the job as he is (except Gore, who is very unlikely to want to dismount from his global messianic perch--no bad thing, by the way--to be V.P. again).

I'm also firmly convinced that Senator Biden's almost paradoxical "happy fighter" attitude, combined with his experience, would help tip the scales in Senator Obama's favor with wavering independent voters who like their political leaders to be "convincing," "positive," and "tough."

Jadism said...

I find your initial premise that the VP choice even matters is faulty. Did Cheney visibly hurt Bush? Did Edwards help Kerry? No to both. I might be remembering this wrong, but I don't even think that Edwards helped Kerry carry N. Carolina.

Veeps are figureheads for the majority of voters. A Catholic is not going vote for Obama because Biden is running with him, a Catholic is going to vote for which ever presidential candidate appeals to him most.

Even if your premise was correct, however, the real danger would be in highlighting the fact that Biden is qualified to be president, and Obabma has yet to prove he's really even qualified to be the junior Senator from Illinois. That constant reminder of his inexperience would hurt him almost as much as choosing...Clinton and her baggage (Bill).

Hasslington said...

J--

Your first point is interesting (I've considered it myself), but I think a bit outdated (or at least not as relevant in 2008 as it was in previous elections). This is particularly the case given Senator Obama's relative political youth--like JFK, he'll need an experienced running mate, and he'll most likely need one that knows the national security structure quite well. Democrats and Republicans may or may not care, but a lot of Independents might, and that is most likely where the upcoming election will be won or lost. So though not the most important choice he has to make, it's important, to be sure.

Your second point might be a bit more convincing. The one problem I see with a Biden (or a Nunn, or a Richardson, or a Clinton) on the ticket is the fact that it will look as though the qualified boss is working for the rising-star intern. But if Senator Obama takes an "above-the-fray" presidential line, and his running mate becomes more of an "attack dog" during the pre-election process, it might work out quite well for them.

Michael Barone had a nice article on why Vice Presidents matter in the recent issue of U.S. News and World Report.

Anonymous said...

Joe Biden would be an excellent choice for VP.
and I agree putting Sebelius on the ticket would be a slap in the face
to any of us that supported Hillary.
If he is going to pick the most qualified woman, it should be Clinton, if not then
he should be looking at who else can step in and be President at a moments notice, Joe Biden answers that call.
GiGi